Accidents: 5 Deadly Sins That Could Wreck Your Injury Claim

January 24th, 2008 by Administrator

Issues that Can Sink Your Case

Here are what I consider to be the Five Deadly Sins that can wreck your personal injury claim. These sins are based upon my experience and discussions with many judges and jurors.

1. The Client is Referred by the Lawyer to a Doctor

Local judges call this “service” the kiss of death to a claim. The problem is that jurors are highly suspicious of lawyers and doctors who have a referral relationship. While the client may not know how many of that lawyer’s clients have been referred in the last 12 months to a particular doctor, you can bet that the insurance company knows it or will find out about it. How credible do you think that doctor’s testimony will be when the jury finds out that he treated 50 patients from the same lawyer last year? Are there exceptions to this rule? Yes, there are. You may have a very special need for a doctor with a special expertise. It is perfectly legitimate for the attorney to make a suggestion or recommendation. If every client though, is getting referred to the same chiropractor or the same orthopedist, then that is a huge problem. (So beware of the attorney who has a stack of doctor/chiropractor cards in his office. You need to ask the right questions and fully understand the business relationship, if any, between that attorney and the doctor.)

2. Hiding Past Accidents From Your Lawyer

Once you begin a case, the other side will be interested in knowing how many past accidents you have been in. The reality is that they probably already know the answer or have easy access to that information. All insurance companies subscribe to insurance databases and often the only reason they ask you this question is to test your credibility. If you have been in other accidents, your lawyer can investigate this and make a determination as to whether this is a valid problem in your case or not. If you do not tell your lawyer, however and you misrepresent your accident history to this insurance company, then it is almost guaranteed that you will lose your case.

3. Hiding Other Injuries

It goes without saying that you should be upfront and honest with your attorney about any injuries that occurred before or after this accident. Again, if you saw a doctor or other healthcare provider, then there is a record in existence that the insurance company will find. Your lawyer can deal with this if he knows about it. If you lie about it, and the insurance company finds out, then your case is over.

4. Not Having Accurate Tax Returns

In most cases, a claimant will have lost income. You will only be able to claim that lost income if your past tax returns are pristine. Again, being honest with your attorney is the only way to be, because he or she can deal with the problem if they know about it.

5. Misrepresenting Your Activity Level

Insurance companies routinely hire private investigators to conduct videotape surveillance. If you claim that you cannot run, climb or stoop, and you get caught on videotape, you can forget about your claim. There is no explanation (other than “You got my brother, not me!”) that can overcome the eye of the camera.

Attorney Oginski has been in practice for 16 years as a trial lawyer practicing exclusively in the State of New York. Attorney Oginski decided he could best serve his clients by opening his own office for the practice of law in cases dealing with injured victims of medical malpractice and accident cases. As of September 1, 2002, Attorney Oginski has been a solo practitioner, and the name of his firm is: The Law Office of Gerald M. Oginski, LLC.” Having his own law firm, he is able to provide the utmost in personalized, individualized attention to each and every client. In our office, a client is not a file number. Client’s are always treated with the respect they deserve. Consultations are always free and totally confidential.

Visit Gerry’s website and read free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read the answers to 139 questions about injury law. Read actual testimony by real doctors in malpractice cases. Our website has had over 70,000 hits in the last 4 months. I guarantee there’s something there for you. http://www.oginski-law.com

Posted in Legal & More | Comments Off

Charlie Chan Does Online Marketing

January 9th, 2008 by Administrator

I used to love to watch the old Charlie Chan movies
on TV. One of Charlie’s famous sayings was, “Life
is like feather in stream…goes where current takes it.”

You know what….for the majority of folks old Charlie
had it about right.

People just drift along going with the flow. Get up, go
to work, come home, eat supper, maybe do a little
yard work or something with the kids, then some TV
and off to bed.

The weekend comes and all those things we were planning
to do, somehow just never seem to happen. We’re too tired,
life gets in the way, we’re burnt out from the week’s work, or
we don’t have enough money.

Then glory be, it’s Monday morning again and back to
the old grind…..over and over and over.

Just drifting along. Life dictates to them. Floating on the
stream and going where the life current takes them. Then one
day 30 or 40 years have passed and they look back and
wonder what happened.

Charlie also said, “Everyone should go fishing at least once
……just for the Halibut.”

So we next find the group of folks who actually make an
effort at getting out of the current and instead of aimlessly
drifting along where ever life takes them they make an
honest effort at trying to improve their conditions.

If you’re one of the folks who fit into that second group…..
then…… Bully For You!

I’m proud of you.

You should be proud of yourself!

It takes a certain amount of courage to do something out
of the ordinary. To get out of the box. To go away from
the mainstream line of thinking.

Good Job!

You want something more for your life and a better tomorrow
for your family.

It isn’t always easy, there are discouragement’s and
disappointments. There are failures and mistakes. There is
rejection. Sometimes you spend a lot of time and
money and don’t get the results you expected.

Sometimes you feel like quitting. Sometimes you feel like
celebrating. Online marketing has it’s ups and downs.

But you’re not a quitter. But sometimes you feel like
just chucking the whole dang thing and taking a break.

But then you consider the alternative: You could be spending
your time watching the idiot box and getting nowhere
but further and further behind.

You’re grossly under paid at the beginning, but because
you stick it out and keep plugging away, you’re grossly
Over paid at the end.

3 to 5 years from now you’ll be somewhere and a lot
better off than you were before.

Where will you be in 3 years if you continue watching
re-runs of The Beverly Hillbillies?…maybe in the same
place Jed was before he struck oil……

So today I want to say just how really proud of you
I am. You’ve got it pal. You are a winner.

You do have what it takes.

You are a leader.

I really believe in you and thank you for breaking out
of the current and trying so hard.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Dave’s E-zine provides you with valuable info
on how to market your online business and how
to make money online. All subscribers get 1
Free ad every week.
Get your FREE subscription today.
http://choosetoprosper.com

Posted in Legal & More | Comments Off

“I Built a Better Mousetrap”– Advice on Protecting Your Cre

December 26th, 2007 by Administrator

So, you built a better mousetrap. Now, how do your protect your “perfect” creation from being stolen by a Fortune 500 company? The answer lies in the United States Constitution which gives the U.S. Congress exclusive authority to grant patents for inventions. Patents on new inventions are not an automatic right. Instead, an inventor must apply and be granted a patent by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce. The process is long, laborious and very time-consuming. How do you start the tedious process?

A U.S. patent is basically a contract between an inventor and the government. The U.S. patent laws were written to provide an incentive to inventors to create and publicly disclose their inventions. In exchange for full disclosure of an invention, the government grants the inventor the right to exclude others from making, selling or importing the patented invention.

There are three types of patents, they are: 1) utility patents which protect the way an article is used and works; 2) design patents which protects the way an article looks; and 3) plant patents issued for asexually reproducing plants.

In order to be patentable, an invention must useful, novel (new), and non-obvious–meaning that when viewed as a whole, the invention must not have been simply an obvious improvement in the invention’s field when viewed by one of ordinary skill in that particular field.

The patent application process generally involves three steps. First, the person (or corporation) seeking the patent must file an application with the Patent Office. In addition to including a detailed description of how to make and use the invention, the application must include patent claims–statements that define the scope of the invention which the inventor is attempting to protect. Once the application has been filed, a patent examiner will be assigned to review the claims and the rest of the application.

The second phase of the process begins with the patent examiner performing a “novelty search”–checking prior patents, and all the available literature to determine whether the invention is really novel and non-obvious. During the course of the patent application process, the patent examiner and the inventor (or his attorney) will communicate back and forth with one another to determine novelty and answer additional questions which may arise.

Finally, the examiner decides on the patentablility of the invention based on the information found during the novelty search. Assuming the examiner is eventually satisfied that the patent claims are narrow enough to distinguish it from “prior art,” and the inventor is satisfied that the claims are still broad enough to have value, the patent will then be issued.

Patent law does allow an inventor to “act for himself” in obtaining a patent, meaning the inventor can do everything himself. However, without some prior experience or some legal training there is the danger of applying for protection that is so broad that your patent is never issued, or is so specific that your invention is not fully protected.

Invention Development Organizations (IDOs) are private and public consulting and marketing businesses that have come into existence to help inventors bring their products to market, or to otherwise profit from their ideas. While many of these organizations are legitimate, some are not. Be extremely wary of any IDO that is willing to promote your invention or product without making a detailed inquiry into the merits of your idea and giving you a full range of options which you may pursue.

To fully protect your creative works and your potential profits, you should always consider obtaining the services of a competent and reliable patent attorney. While the costs may appear expensive, the protection offered by a U.S. patent for a commercially valuable invention more than justifies the cost.

Even after your patent has been granted, you may still require professional patent assistance. Patent professionals can monitor the marketplace for inventors (or copycats) who are infringing on your ideas. The strongest patent in the world is worthless if you do not ensure that it is being enforced.

About the Author

Larry Denton is a retired history teacher having taught 33 years at Hobson High in Hobson, Montana. He is currently Vice President of Elfin Enterprise, Inc., an Internet business providing information and resources on a number of timely topics. For a court room full of additional information and answers to your patent questions visit http://www.PatentPath.com

Posted in Legal & More | Comments Off

Should You Hire An Accident Attorney

November 24th, 2007 by Administrator

The following article was written for Resources For Attorneys.com by David Hallstrom, a private investigator, he is not now nor has he ever been an attorney.

You have been in a accident, automobile, slip and fall, workplace, etc.. Should you see or speak with an attorney?

As far as I am concerned, the answer is always yes.

When should you consult with an accident attorney? You should seek the advise of an accident attorney as soon as possible after the accident. Do not wait. You could be giving up certain rights. You should definetly speak with an attorney before speaking with the other sides insurance agent, adjuster or attorney.

You say that you can not afford an attorney. Most accident attorneys will consult with you for free and, if they take your case, will handle it on a contingency basis, not taking any fee untill the case is settled. Most settlements are increased to cover the cost of the attorney and therefore normally the attorney costs you nothing. Many attorneys will also advance all court costs for you if they are forced to file suit.

You say that you were injured, however, the insurance company has offered to pay your medical bills and you do not feel it is right to take advantage of them by asking for additional money for your, pain, suffering, lost work, etc.. Don’t you feel that you as a person are worth something? Do you think so little of yourself that you feel that your pain, suffering, inconvience, etc. is worthless. You did not cause this accident. What you are going through was caused by someone else. You deserve to be compensated. The insurance company, as a matter of good business, has already built these types of costs into the premiums that they charge their customers. If the money does not go to you it will probably go to their shareholders or to increased salaries or ?. Why shouldn’t you be properly compensated. Remember most good attorneys are ethical and although they will attempt to obtain as much money for you as is due, they will not take your case unless they feel that it is proper.

You say someone else admitted liability and said that their insurance will pay all your damages. That’s great, however, what if the person changes his or her story later on and says that you were at fault. Or what if the other side’s insurance company refuses to pay what you think is proper. In fact, how do you know what is proper? Remember, an insurance company may pay claims, but it is in business to make money. It normally will not offer one dollar more than it has to and if you are not represented by an attorney the insurance company adjuster or attorney may feel that he or she can “get away” with paying much less than the claim may be worth. Additionally, what people state at the time of an accident is not always what they state after having spoken with a friend, insurance agent or attorney. Finally, an insurance adjuster or insurance attorney works for the insurance company, not for you. How do you know that what they are telling you is correct or true. Remember, in most instances, they are there to try and save the company money. You need an attorney on your side to tell you what your rights and obligations are.

You say that you were not hurt that bad or at all. How do you know how badly you were hurt. Some injuries do not show up for months. Other injuries may aggrivate a prior problem. Even if you have been found to be “ok” by a doctor, how do you know that a problem will not come up later. If you have insurance and did go to a doctor, who is going to pay your co-pay or deductible. If you do not have health insurance, who is going to pay for your examination which should include xrays, etc.. If you retain an attorney he or she can probably refer you to a doctor who will accept a lien against the insurance settlement, thereby saving you from paying money out of your pocket.

You say you have accident insurance, why not let them handle everthing for you. Your insurance company is there to defend any claims against you not to represent you in any claims against other parties. Additionally, they also are in business to make money. How do you know if they are trying to settle a case to help you or to save themselves money.

The foregoing article was written by the author based on experiences he has had as a private investigator representing both accident attorneys and insurance companies. This article is not stated as a legal opinion or as fact but instead is stated as opinion of the author.

Permission is given to reprint this article providing credit is given to the author, David G. Hallstrom, and a link is listed to Resources For Attorneys the owner of this article. Anyone or any company reprinting this article without giving proper credit and the correct link, is doing so without permission and will be subject to legal action.

For a nationwide directory of attorneys see usattorneysdirectory.us Or for more articles about attorneys or other lrgal matters see Legal Articles about resources for attorneys   resources for attorneys home   submit an articlereport bad links   contact us   

©Copyright 2004 Resources For Attorneys. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.

David Hallstrom has been a licensed private investigator for over thirty years. The majority, over 2000, of his clients are attorneys. He is also the President of Resources For Attorneys.com, a legal and lifestyle resource directory for attorneys, lawyers and the internet public.

Posted in Legal & More | Comments Off

Rosen Divorce On-Line Child Support Calculator

November 23rd, 2007 by Administrator

Raleigh, NC- Rosen Divorce, the state’s largest divorce firm known for its unique approach to handling marital disputes, recently revamped their on-line child support calculator making it more user-friendly.

The new child support calculator takes the user step-by-step through the process and explains each element of the formula to determine respective child support expenses. “We realized a lot of people weren’t sure which worksheet to use, so now the calculator determines the proper worksheet based on answers inputted in the wizard,” says Lee Rosen, attorney and president of Rosen Divorce. The calculator displays recommended child support amounts and uses the information provided to complete a printable worksheet that can even be filed with the court.

Rosen Divorce recognizes the need for families to have the ability to quickly and easily determine child support. “We wanted to make this as easy as possible for our clients and anyone else visiting our site,” says Rosen. The new child support calculator makes it easier for parents or attorneys to input the relevant information, including monthly income and the amount of time children spend with both parents, to determine individual child support obligations. The user can fill in the information and the child support calculator will determine obligations instantaneously, for both parties.

“Our new calculator is completely different from North Carolina’s state calculator, it’s a whole new way of figuring out child support expenses,” says Rosen. “We had the first calculator up on the web where tens of thousands of people have used it over the years. We know what works and what doesn’t, so we totally revamped the calculator based on our users’ ideas.”

Some companies charge an upwards of $45 to do the same calculation that’s free using Rosen Divorce’s child support calculator. It’s quick in response and accurate, as it’s based on the guidelines established by the Conference of Chief District Court Judges.

To view the website and access the child support calculator, visit: www.rosendivorce.com/cscalculator

With offices in Raleigh and Charlotte, Rosen Divorce is the largest divorce firm in North Carolina. Founded in 1990, the firm is dedicated to providing individual growth and support to couples seeking divorce by helping them move forward with their lives. Our staff of attorneys, accountants, and specially trained divorce coaches expertly address the complex issues of ending a marriage. Our innovative approach acknowledges that divorce is so much more than just a legal matter. Specialties include child custody, alimony, property distribution, separation agreements, and domestic violence relief.

For more information on Rosen Divorce, or for an interview, please contact: Alison Kramer, Director of Public Relations, Office: 919-256-1542, Cell: 919-523-7104, akramer@rosen.com, https://www.rosendivorce.com

***

ROSEN DIVORCE
4101 Lake Boone Trail, Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27607
www.rosendivorce.com
“Divorce is Different Here”

About the Author

None

Posted in Legal & More | Comments Off

Lawsuit Loans. No Risk Loans

November 10th, 2007 by Administrator

A relatively new source of financing is now available for both individuals and business owners. It is called lawsuit financing, often referred to as lawsuit loans or lawsuit funding. But these are not loans because the money does not have to be paid back unless the case is won.

Lawsuit financing (loans) help clients who are having financial difficulties. Lawsuit funders do not require credit checks, monthly payments, notes, or any other security.

Frequently, claimants have missed work or lost their job and can no longer meet their rent or automobile payments. In the past, these claimants have needed to accept lesser settlement amounts due to pressing financial difficulties. Now, clients can sustain their personal lives and give the attorney the necessary time to achieve the full value of the case.

Often times, individual claimants and commercial litigants require financial loan assistance prior to settlement or judgment. Types of cases that qualify are:

  • Personal Injury: Automobile Accidents, Any Type
  • Malpractice: Medical-Legal, Accounting, Construction,
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Discrimination
  • Harassment: Sexual/Rape, Any Type
  • And much more

There are a handful of companies that provide lawsuit funding. For more information on these lawsuit loan companies please visit http://www.fredcoutts.com/indexlawsuit.htm. Each company provides funding that is specific to their criteria. All lawsuit funding companies will provide funding for personal injury lawsuits. But there are only a couple that will fund commercial and other non- personal injury lawsuit cases.

Rates will vary depending upon the risk. Lawsuit funding companies will generally finance up to 10-15% of the potential settlement value. For example, if the case has a potential value of $100,000, you can expect a funding offer of $10,000 to $15,000. Lawsuit funding companies carefully analyze the cases they choose to fund. They must like the lawyer as well as the potential settlement value.

Lawsuit funding is available in most states and can be a very beneficial source of funds.

For more information please contact the author Fred Coutts at http://www.fredcoutts.com/indexlawsuit.htm.

About The Author

Fred Coutts,CPA, CMA. Since 1980, Fred has been crafting powerful cash flow solutions for businesses and individuals alike, from entreptreneurs to “Fortune 500″ companies. He has built a solid foundation of financial and operational experience through many executive roles, including those as CFO and Controller. Fred is well versed and experienced in finance, accounting, and business operations.

Over the years Fred has developed relationships with funding connections nationwide, both traditional and non-traditional sources to help you meet your cash flow needs.

Fred@FredCoutts.com

Posted in Legal & More | Comments Off

Fundamentals of Contract Law

November 5th, 2007 by Administrator

No matter where you live in North America, you must have seen some humoristic vignettes depicting a not-so-trustworthy Realtor intent at selling a house to some innocent-looking couple. My favorite vignette, which still makes me chuckle today, goes back to a few years ago when I was practicing real estate at United Realty. It involved a Real Estate Agent of Pompeii Realty, briefcase in hand, in the process of selling a house to an ancient Roman couple sometimes around 100 BC . The house is overlooking Mt. Vesuvius. There is a black, threatening, ominous plume of smoke coming out of the top of the volcano, and the Roman couple looks somewhat startled when the Real Estate Agent - big smile on his face - delivers the punchline: ” Plus, with a view like this what could possibly go wrong” !

What is it exactly that you do when you sign a ‘contract’ . The term ‘contract’ means a promise or a set of promises made by one person to another, which the Courts will enforce. A contract can contain a number of promises or ‘terms’ to be performed by either party. The person who makes the promise is called the ‘promissor’ and the person who can enforce that promise is called the ‘promissee’ . If the contract contains several mutual promises, each party will be both a promissor and a promissee. Contracts of Purchase and Sale of land and interests in land usually have lots of mutual promises. Contracts are a crucial part of every business transaction, but not nearly as much as in Real Estate. For instance, some contracts are made verbally while others are made by simply exchanging letters or even e-mails. This is not the case in Real Estate, where it is a requirement at Law that contracts be written down in usually lengthy legal forms to avoid uncertainty, ambiguity and to be binding .

A contract has seven essential elements:

Offer.

Acceptance.

Consideration

Legal Intent.

Capacity.

Legal Object.

Genuine Consent.

Each of these elements must be present for a contract to be binding and enforceable. Let’s examine them individually.

OFFER

An offer is the promise made by one party to another. Save and except in Real Estate where the offer must be in writing, an offer can be made in any form. In all circumstances, however, an offer must be made in clear an unambigous terms. If more than one interpretation can be given to an offer, neither interpretation will be followed by the Courts. There are ‘unilateral’ and ‘bilateral’ offers. Offers to purchase real property are bilateral, i.e. containing the exchange of mutual promises.

An offer is not made forever. Offers can either be finalized, when all mutual promises are fulfilled. Or they can expire, if not timely accepted. Or they can be released, if one of the parties does not - or cannot - deliver on the promise. Offers can also be revoked after acceptance, unless a term of the offer stipulates that revocation is not allowed.- as it is now the case in British Columbia for offers involving land. A ‘counter-offer’ is simply an offer from the offeree back to the offeror. The legal effect of a counter-offer is to terminate the original offer and substitute the offer of the offeree. What this means in practicality is that if the counter-offer is not accepted, the offeree cannot try to accept the first offer unless it is tendered again by the offeror. This is a point often times neglected in Real Estate, which has caused several tears to be spilled.

ACCEPTANCE

The acceptance, like the offer, must be given in clear terms. It must be a positive act. For instance, an offer cannot state “If I don’t hear from you, I will assume you have accepted”. Doing nothing will never be considered legal acceptance. The rule at Law is that where an offer is required by statute to be in writing, then also the acceptance must be in writing in order for the offer to become a contract binding on both parties. Such is the case in Real Estate. An acceptance has no effect until it is communicated to the offeror. Communication can be made by ‘instantaneous means’ as in the case of telephone or teletype or fax communications, or e-mail or hand-delivery and by ‘non-instantaneous means’ such as postal mail. The Law gives the responsibility to the offeror to specify how he wants the offer to be accepted. If the offeror chooses a method like slow mail, then he assumes the risks involved in that type of service (such as misdelivery).

CONSIDERATION

For an offer and acceptance to form a contract there must be consideration or the contract must be signed under seal. Consideration is defined as ’some right, benefit or profit accruing to the promissor or some forebearance, detriment, loss or otherwise responsibility suffered by the promissee’ . What this means is that the party trying to enforce the contract must have ‘paid’ something in exchange for the promise of the other party. Consideration must be of real value, but it does not have to be money. For example, a mutual exchange of promises is consideration per se.

LEGAL INTENTION

For a person to be bound to a contract, he must seriously intend to create legal obligations. For example, inviting a guest for dinner would normally not be considered a contract intended to create legal obligations. The Law presumes that there is legal intention in a contract involving total strangers. On the other hand, if the contract is between family members the Law presumes that there is no intention to be so bound (non arm-length transaction). However, this presumption can be reversed if there is evidence to show otherwise.

CAPACITY

Even when all the foregoing essential elements exist, a contract can still be void, voidable or illegal. A void contract is one which is deemed at Law never to have existed. A voidable contract is slightly different: it exists until it is repudiated by one of the parties. An illegal contract is one which is made for an illegal purpose, and which is therefore always void. Examples of voidable contracts are the ones made when one of the parties is an infant, i.e. a minor or under the majority age. In this case the contract can be voided by the infant. Likewise, when one of the parties is legally insane, the contract is voidable. A special case is a contract stipulated when one of the parties is a limited company or corporation. Three questions must be first answered before the contract can be enforceable: 1) whether the corporation does in fact exist and 2) whether it has the capacity to enter into the contract and 3) whether the person signing on behalf of the corporation is, in fact, the authorized signatory.

LEGAL OBJECT

Quite aside from blatantly illegal contracts such as, for examples, contracts to commit a crime or tort until recently here in British Columbia certain other types of contracts where considered illegal. For example, until the mid-80’s contracts involving the sale of land made on a Sunday were deemed to be a contravention of s.4 of the Lord’s Day Act(now repealed) and, thus, illegal and void. Since then, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the application of s.4 - in fact the entire Lord’s Day Act - is unconstitutional in that it infringes on the freedom of conscience and religion guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom.

GENUINE CONSENT

If one of the parties makes a misrepresentation or if the contract contains an inherent mistake, the contract may still not be binding. A misrepresentation is, by definition, a statement which is false and which must have induced one of the parties to enter into the contract. A misrepresentation can be innocent, negligent or fraudulent and different remedies are available to the party suffering damages because of the nature of the misrepresentation. If the representation is innocent, the party can sue for rescission of the contract. In the case of negligent or fraudulent misrepresentation, the affected party can sue for damages as well. Although misrepresentation requires a statement to be made, in Real Estate silence too can result in some form of misrepresentation. Disclosure of latent defects is one such example: failure to disclose latent defects on the part of the Seller will not, by itself, affect the consent of the parties but will have similar consequences as misrepresentation.

In the case of inherent mistake, true consent of the parties does not exist. The logic behind this notion is that the parties were negotiating for a subject matter other than the one stipulated in the contract. A specific type of mistake is sometimes referred to as ‘non est factum’ , Latin for ‘this is not my deed’ . This occurs when a person executes one form of document thinking the document is something else. Duress and undue influence both affect the genuine consent element of a contract. Duress occurs when a person is forced to enter into the contract against his will. As a result, the Courts will find the contract voidable at his option. Undue influence, on the other hand, is more subtle. Like duress it results in one party losing his free will to contract out. However it occurs more frequently when a person is in a superior or dominant position in relation to another and uses this influential position to induce the other to enter into the contract. Again, if undue influence is found, the contract is voidable at the option of the innocent party.

Luigi Frascati

luigi@dccnet.com

www.luigifrascati.com
Real Estate Chronicle

Luigi Frascati - EzineArticles Expert Author

Luigi Frascati is a Real Estate Agent based in Vancouver, British Columbia. He is the author of the Real Estate Chronicle, his weblog published online. Luigi holds a Bachelor Degree in Economics and has been practising real estate for the past eighteen years

Posted in Legal & More | Comments Off

Lawsuit Financing: A Viable Option for Those Struggling to Pursue Justice

October 3rd, 2007 by Administrator

Are you and your family suffering financial hardship while you’re fighting a pending lawsuit? If so, don’t get discouraged and settle early for a lower amount. Consider using lawsuit financing to meet your financial needs.

Lawsuit financing is a cash advance, provided to injured parties in return for a promise to repay the advance after they win their case. The advance typically covers living expenses, medical and health care costs, expert witness, research, and attorney fees. But you can use the funds for anything: house and car payments, college tuition, car notes and daily living expenses. With lawsuit financing, you can continue your case and get the settlement you rightfully deserve.

Because lawsuit financing is non-recourse funding, not a loan, there are no monthly payments to make. Therefore, repayment of the advanced funds isn’t required until after your case has been settled. And if you fail to win your case, you don’t have to repay the advanced funds. The company that provided the funds as an investment bears the full risk. But if you win, the funding company will have a legal right to part of your award.

How Lawsuit Financing Works
Lawsuit financing can provide a financial float to floundering litigants involved in cases ranging from medical malpractice and personal injury to worker’s compensation and sexual harassment. When an injured person receives lawsuit financing, he or she takes a lien on their future proceeds in exchange for cash today. The lien is for the amount of the cash advance and a specified monthly interest rate and is deducted from the settlement or judgment received from the outcome of the suit.

Generally, the lawsuit should be at least six months old, with settlement likely to take place within at least 18 months. Lawsuit financing companies will provide you with up to 20 percent of the expected judgment in return for a lien against the entire award remaining. This lien follows any claims placed on the case for attorney or medical fees. By minimizing the funded amount and time remaining on the case, lawsuit financing companies are able to keep litigant’s costs small relative to their increased gain.

As investors, lawsuit financing companies will assess your case and estimate the value of the case and the risk involved. That estimate will determine how much cash you’re advanced. This amount will actually depend on the nature of the case, insurance company involved, how long the case has been active, and the expected settlement date. The company’s fee may be a flat fee or a percentage fee that accrues monthly. But, remember, you only have to pay the fee if you win.

Why Lawsuit Financing?
Litigation can be slow, stressful and extremely expensive. In fact, lawsuits cost America $246 billion a year, according to the President’s Council of Economic Advisers. Cases may drag on for months and years, producing mounting legal and other expenses in the process. During this time, litigants—many of whom are unable to work—still must have enough money to live on and support their families. Often, they face the threat of losing their home, car and well being. The strain on their finances and emotions may force them to consider settling out of court.

However, lawsuit financing can enable them to hold out long enough to receive a much larger settlement. In short, lawsuit financing can fill a vital need for litigants who have no other viable option. And the fees involved in this type of funding may be a small price to pay for the larger gain they can enjoy.

Eligibility for Lawsuit Financing
Lawsuit financing may be the best resort if you are suffering financial hardship and have exhausted all other means of getting financing help. Qualifying is relatively easy, compared to traditional types of financing. In fact, the standard requirements, such as good credit and employment, don’t apply.

Instead, eligibility is based strictly on the merits of your case. If you have a solid case with a high chance of winning, lawsuit financing will be easier to obtain. People who may be able to secure litigation funding include those who:

- Were injured in a car, boating or amusement park accident
- Are involved in a medical malpractice case with a doctor, nurse or paramedic
- Have been injured on the job or by dangerous products
- Are litigants in a wrongful death case
- Had a serious slip-and-fall accident
- Suffered from breach of contract
- Were discriminated against
- Were wrongfully terminated

Lawsuit financing can provide critical financial support for you and your family while you pursue justice.

David Springer - EzineArticles Expert Author

Sovereign Funding Group is an experienced, reputable company that offers convenient, no-risk services to help you with the selling of your deferred payments and business financing, including lawsuit financing.

Posted in Legal & More | Comments Off

Tractor Trailer Underride Accidents.

September 28th, 2007 by Administrator

What is a Tractor Trailer Underride Accident?

Tractor-Trailer underride accidents occur when a passenger vehicle, usually the front of the passenger vehicle, enters below the base of the trailer of a large truck (e.g., 18-wheeler). This is particularly possible with small family passenger cars (as opposed to a mini-van or SUV). Unfortunately, the height of the front of the car is insufficient to contact the bed of the truck, often 10 to 20 inches below the bed of the truck. This puts the bed of the truck right at the head-chest level of the passengers within the car. Injuries in these accidents tend to be catastrophic, if not fatal.

Why doesn’t the driver just slow down to prevent an underride accident?

A tractor-trailer truck is pretty big… so why doesn’t the car driver see the tractor trailer in time to prevent a underride accident?

Unfortunately, perception and reality meet too late in these circumstances. Often the driver is fooled into thinking that the roadway is clear. Simply, the passenger car driver does not have adequate warning of the impending trailer underride danger.

What is being done to improve driver perception or trailer safety?

Since 1993, trucks must have a special type of reflective tape on the rear and sides of the trailer. Since 1996, trucks must also be equiped with a rear underride guard (strong metal structure) at a height of 22 inches above the ground, so that it will easily come in contact with the engine block of a small car, and thus prevent the car from underriding the bed of the tractor truck trailer. However, it is sad news that many trucks have not been retrofitted. Thus, many tractor trailer trucks manufactured before 1996 are on the road without these two critical safety features. In addition, even ones that have had these features installed may have insufficient protective qualities, such as an inadequate amount of reflective material or a rear underride guard that is too weak to prevent underride of the passenger vehicle.

What are other factors that play into a rear underride accident

Weather. Especially fog, snow, or rain that reduces the distance of visibility. Fog and snow are a huge problem, since they often mask the grey or white color of many trucks.

Driver carelessness. If the driver is momentarily inattentive, they may not see a trailer that has been inadequately pulled to the side of the road, or a trailer that is across the highway as the result of a u-turn or a wide turn in the case of a truck entering a roadway.

The positioning of the truck may cause a trailer underride accident.

Road conditions. Slick road conditions increase the stopping time for a car approaching a tractor trailer underride situation.

Surrounding (ambient) lighting which can reflect off of the truck and cause the truck to blend in with its surrounding, forming a sort of accidental camaflouge, especially on a silver truck. In fact often the reflective red/oraqnge colors match the neon lights from surrounding businesses.

Road lighting. A lack of road lighting can make it very difficult to see the outline of the tractor truck’s trailer. Especially a dark colored trruck trailer such as a dark blue, brown or black trailer. This makes it nearly impossible for the driver of the passenger car to see the truck in time to stop and prevent a trailer underride.

Dirty tractor trailers case accidents. When dirt collects on the reflective tape, it becomes inefficeint at reflecting light and loses its protective warning qualities. Frequent washing of the truck is a must to give the passenger car driver a chance to prevent a side underride accident with the tractor trailer!

What is the most common danger that creates a Tractor Trailer Underride Accident?

Truck driver making a u-turn or a wide-turn. This is not a sudden u-turn. Rather, this is a situation where often the truck has made it already half way around. In fact, the cab of the truck is often facing the oncoming traffic. That fact makes it even more deceiving to the oncoming traffic, since they belive that the truck is already facing them, with the trailer straight behind it, rather than reality - with the tractor truck’s trailer stretched across the oncoming car’s path of transit.

About the Author

by: Michael Monheit, Esquire of Monheit Law, P.C. Toll Free: 866-761-1385
Truck Accident Lawyer

Posted in Legal & More | Comments Off

Tractor Trailer Truck Driver Fatigue

September 24th, 2007 by Administrator

by: Michael Monheit, Esquire of Monheit Law, P.C.
Toll Free: 866-761-1385

How current an issue is tractor trailer truck driver fatigue?

Truck driver fatigue is a very current issue and has been the subject of recent regulatory activity. Truck driver fatigue is the subject of new regulations issued by the USDOT (U.S. Department of Transportation) through the FMCSA branch, which handles motor carrier (trucking) issues . Pursuant to these rules, a tractor trailer truck driver may only drive 11 hours after 10 consecutive hours off. In addition, in order to prevent driver fatiugue, a tractor trailer truck driver may not drive more than 60 hours in any seven day period. If a driver takes 2.5 days off, he can clean his consecutive hours slate and start at 0 again.

Why not require even stricter time limits to prevent driver fatigue?

Another factor in preventing accidents is driver experience. If stricter guidelines were put in place immediately, there would be an insufficient number of experienced drivers. Thus, while decreasing the number of accidents caused by tractor trailer truck driver fatigue, we would see an offset and even increase in total accidents due to those accidents caused by truck driver inexperience.

Are all hours logged, or just driving hours?

The Truckload Carriers Association has stated that drivers “understate their non-driving hours in their log books” and that to improve sales, companies expect their drivers to “wait, unload, and load at the shipper’s warehouses at no cost to the shipper” and only then, begin logging time for their 11 hours. This may increase the actual work hours by 50%, thus significantly increases the risk of truck driver fatigue.

How common is tractor trailer driver fatiuge in causing accidents?

The NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) estimates that truck driver fatigue (lack of sleep, overwork) may be a factor in over a third of all large (semi, 18 wheeler) truck accidents. Further, the NTSB found that truck driver fatigue was the most likley cause in over 30% of crashes that were fatal to the fatigued truck driver.

How common is it for a truck driver to fall asleep at the wheel?

In the Journal of Public Health Policy, in 1992, a report showed that 1 in 5 truck drivers had been so fatigued that they had fallen asleep at the wheel.

What is truck driver fatigue?

Fatigue is a broad term and includes being “sleepy”, “tired” or “exhausted”. This applies not only to the performance of physical activity, but to mental activity as well. Thus, the decision making capabilities of a truck driver can be impared along with coordination. Fatigue can severely impair judgment. In addition, the more tired you become, the less likely you will be to recognize that you are tired.
What are the warning sigs of truck driver fatigue?
yawning
lack of concentration
red eyes
anxiousness
restlessness
drowsiness
impaired reaction time
attention deficit
irritability
large steering corrections
missing road signs
lane drift

What are the high risk times for truck driver fatigue-related fatal crashes?

Studies show that fatal fatigue-related accidents tend to occur between 10pm-6am (during normal human sleep hours), and 1pm-3pm (after a heavy lunch). These times of the day coincide with dips in the body’s circadian rhythms, and with drops in blood sugar, which are part of the human makeup.

Will these new regualtions cut down on fatal crashes due to truck driver fatigue?

The FMCSA estimates that 75 lives will be saved each year and 1,326 fatigue-related tractor-trailer truck accidents will be prevented annually.

About the Author

Michael Monheit, Esquire
http://www.monheit.com/truck
Truck Accident: Lawyer Case Inquiry Form
Toll Free: 866-761-1385

Posted in Legal & More | Comments Off

« Previous Entries Next Entries »